ArticleAIMS neuroscience2025
Personalized neural responses to self and filial reward: Functional and structural responses to motivational cues.
Article in AIMS neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding how individuals interact with reward-related cues in their environment provides insight into the neural mechanisms underlying motivation and personalized behavior. While monetary rewards for self are well studied, the neural basis of socially relevant rewards-such as filial reward-remains less understood. This study investigated functional and structural brain responses to reward gained from a cognitive task performance for self or for parents (filial) using functional MRI (fMRI) and diffusion MRI (dMRI) in young adults, reflecting personalized interaction with environmental cues. Thirty-two healthy young adults (17 males, mean age = 23 ± 1 years) performed a 2-back working memory task cued for reward conditions for self and for parents during fMRI scanning, followed by dMRI acquisition. Participants were categorized based on the reward condition in which they showed the highest score in task performance. Self-reported reward responsiveness scores were also collected. Random-effects fMRI analysis revealed activation of the putamen in the self-reward condition, more than in the filial reward condition. Using this region as a seed, probabilistic tractography was conducted to compute connection probability indices (CPI) to key target areas: anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), dorsolateral and ventrolateral prefrontal cortices, anterior/posterior insula, and amygdala. The nucleus accumbens (NAcc) was included as a comparative seed. While the cue for self-reward elicited activation in the reward area putamen, with higher white matter connectivity from the right putamen to the ACC, a cue for filial reward significantly activated the right insula. Lateralization to the right insula was also seen in the structural connectivity to NAcc in the filial group. Filial reward also displayed a positive relationship between white matter connectivity of left NAcc to PCC with reward responsiveness. These results demonstrate individualized neural responses shaped by the self and social relevance of the reward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.