Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41334315›Full record

ArticleAIMS neuroscience2025

Personalized neural responses to self and filial reward: Functional and structural responses to motivational cues.

Siti Mariam Roslan, Siti Hajar Zabri, Nur Ayunie Ayob, Aini Ismafairus Abd Hamid, Nur Hartini Mohd Taib, Rahimah Zakaria, Sofina Tamam, Hazim Omar, Alwani Liyana Ahmad, Wan Mohd Zahiruddin Wan Mohammad and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIMS neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Siti Mariam RoslanSchool of Medical Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Siti Hajar ZabriSchool of Medical Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Nur Ayunie AyobSchool of Medical Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Aini Ismafairus Abd HamidSchool of Medical Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Nur Hartini Mohd TaibSchool of Medical Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Rahimah ZakariaSchool of Medical Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Sofina TamamFaculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, 71800 Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia.
Hazim OmarSchool of Medical Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Alwani Liyana AhmadSchool of Medical Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Wan Mohd Zahiruddin Wan MohammadSchool of Medical Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Aleya Aziz MarzukiDepartment for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Asma Hayati AhmadSchool of Medical Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how individuals interact with reward-related cues in their environment provides insight into the neural mechanisms underlying motivation and personalized behavior. While monetary rewards for self are well studied, the neural basis of socially relevant rewards-such as filial reward-remains less understood. This study investigated functional and structural brain responses to reward gained from a cognitive task performance for self or for parents (filial) using functional MRI (fMRI) and diffusion MRI (dMRI) in young adults, reflecting personalized interaction with environmental cues. Thirty-two healthy young adults (17 males, mean age = 23 ± 1 years) performed a 2-back working memory task cued for reward conditions for self and for parents during fMRI scanning, followed by dMRI acquisition. Participants were categorized based on the reward condition in which they showed the highest score in task performance. Self-reported reward responsiveness scores were also collected. Random-effects fMRI analysis revealed activation of the putamen in the self-reward condition, more than in the filial reward condition. Using this region as a seed, probabilistic tractography was conducted to compute connection probability indices (CPI) to key target areas: anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), dorsolateral and ventrolateral prefrontal cortices, anterior/posterior insula, and amygdala. The nucleus accumbens (NAcc) was included as a comparative seed. While the cue for self-reward elicited activation in the reward area putamen, with higher white matter connectivity from the right putamen to the ACC, a cue for filial reward significantly activated the right insula. Lateralization to the right insula was also seen in the structural connectivity to NAcc in the filial group. Filial reward also displayed a positive relationship between white matter connectivity of left NAcc to PCC with reward responsiveness. These results demonstrate individualized neural responses shaped by the self and social relevance of the reward.

Indexed as

cuesdMRIfilialfMRIreward

Identifiers

PMID41334315
PMCPMC12667375

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.