ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Multidimensional dietary assessment and interpretable machine learning models predict the risk of prediabetes/diabetes and osteoporosis comorbidity in older adults.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Joint association of physical activity and dietary quality with advanced cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome in older adults: A population-based study.Atencion primaria · 2026Article
- An explainable machine learning method for identifying key atherogenic lipid biomarkers in abdominal obesity among the Southern Chinese population.Lipids in health and disease · 2026Article
- Predicting Depression Risk in Physically Inactive Older Adults Using Dietary Antioxidants and Machine Learning: A SHAP-Interpretable Analysis of NHANES.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The health burden of diabetes mellitus and osteoporosis (DM-OP) comorbidity in the aging population is increasing, and dietary factors are modifiable risk determinants. This study developed and validated a machine learning model to predict DM-OP comorbidity using multidimensional dietary assessment. Methods: This study utilized data from NHANES cycles 2005-2010, 2013-2014, and 2017-2020, ultimately including 4,678 participants aged ≥65 years. Dietary data were collected through 24-h dietary recalls, encompassing macronutrients, micronutrients, food processing classification (NOVA), and five dietary quality scores. Missing data were handled using random forest algorithm, feature selection was performed using Boruta algorithm, and SMOTE technique addressed class imbalance. Eight machine learning algorithms (XGBoost, decision tree, logistic regression, multilayer perceptron, naive Bayes, k-nearest neighbors, random forest, and support vector machine) were implemented with 10-fold cross-validation for performance evaluation. Results: A total of 4,678 participants were included, with 347 (7.4%) having DM-OP comorbidity (concurrent prediabetes/diabetes and osteoporosis). After feature selection, 46 variables were retained for model construction. The random forest model demonstrated superior predictive performance with the lowest error rate (0.161), highest accuracy (0.839), ROC AUC of 0.965, sensitivity of 0.827, and specificity of 0.852. SHAP analysis revealed gender as the most important predictor, with females at higher risk; BMI showed positive correlation with comorbidity risk; while carotenoid, vitamin E, magnesium, and zinc intake were negatively correlated with disease risk, suggesting potential protective associations. An online risk prediction tool was developed based on the optimized random forest model for real-time individual comorbidity risk calculation. Conclusion: The random forest model demonstrated excellent performance in predicting diabetes-osteoporosis comorbidity in elderly adults, with gender, BMI, and specific nutrient intake as key predictors. This model provides an effective tool for clinical early identification of high-risk populations and implementation of preventive interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.