ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
Laparoscopic Appendectomy Is Superior in Patients with Higher Fat Thickness.
Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Laparoscopic and Robotic Appendectomy: Efficiency and Cost Comparison.Journal of surgery and research · 2026Article
- Clinical application of modified suspension-assisted transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in overweight/obese patients.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- "Laparoscopic Appendectomy Is Superior in Patients with Higher Fat Thickness' with Great Interest".JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Acute appendicitis (AA) is a frequent surgical emergency. Although laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is associated with favorable postoperative outcomes, open appendectomy (OA) remains widely used. Surgical site infection (SSI) is a common complication, with obesity recognized as a risk factor. However, body mass index (BMI) may not reliably reflect fat distribution. Subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT) measured on computed tomography (CT) may offer improved predictive value for surgical outcomes. Methods: This retrospective study included 1,231 patients who underwent LA or OA for AA between 2017 and 2022. Preoperative SFT was measured on CT, and patients were analyzed by surgical technique and SFT subgroups. Postoperative complications, including SSI, were recorded. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified the SFT threshold associated with increased SSI risk. Results: Despite similar BMI values between groups, SFT was significantly higher in LA patients ( Conclusion: LA offers superior outcomes compared to open surgery, particularly in patients with higher SFT. The discrepancy between BMI and SFT underscores the need for direct fat measurement in surgical risk assessment. Incorporating SFT into preoperative evaluation can guide optimal surgical strategy and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.