Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41334813›Full record

ArticleSystematic biology2026

Population Size Differences Can Lead to Biases in Phylogenetic Inference and Introgression Detection in the Presence of Purifying Selection.

Chong He, Meng-Yun Chen, Hao Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chong HeBioinformatics Section, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, 1023 Shatai Nan Road, Guangzhou 510515, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6194-3374
Meng-Yun ChenGuangzhou Key Laboratory of Subtropical Biodiversity and Biomonitoring, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biotechnology for Plant Development, School of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, 55 West Zhongshan Avenue, Guangzhou 510631, China.
Hao ZhuBioinformatics Section, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, 1023 Shatai Nan Road, Guangzhou 510515, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31771456National Natural Science Foundation of China 32370009Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2022A1515010464
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assumptions about the probability distribution of gene tree topologies provide a basis for phylogenetic reconstruction and introgression detection. Initial evidence has suggested that in the presence of purifying selection, population size differences can affect the probability distribution of gene tree topologies. Nevertheless, the impact of this phenomenon on phylogenetic reconstruction and introgression detection remains to be explored. Additionally, a theoretical understanding of this phenomenon remains absent. Here, using the population genetic simulation software SLiM, we provide evidence that in the presence of purifying selection, population size differences can cause biases in phylogenetic inference. We also provide evidence that in the presence of purifying selection, population size differences can cause statistics used for introgression detection to exhibit patterns resembling those caused by introgression. Additionally, we present a theoretical analysis showing that using a random gene tree labeling process to model the gene tree formation process in the occurrence of deep coalescence lacks a biological basis under purifying selection, and gene tree distributions under purifying selection are expected to exhibit population size dependence. This work underscores the importance of considering the potential confounding impact of purifying selection on phylogenetic inference and introgression detection.

Indexed as

ClassificationGenetic IntrogressionModels, GeneticPhylogenySelection, GeneticComputer SimulationPopulation DensityGene tree distributionintrogressionphylogenypurifying selectionspecies tree

Identifiers

PMID41334813
PMCPMC13260655

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.