ReviewBiomolecules & biomedicine2025
Platelet-rich plasma and hyaluronic acid in the treatment of acute ankle sprains: A review.
Review in Biomolecules & biomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ankle sprains are prevalent musculoskeletal injuries commonly encountered in the general population, particularly among athletes. While conventional treatments are widely practiced, regenerative therapies have emerged as potential adjunctive options. This narrative review aims to assess the role of regenerative therapy in the management of acute ankle sprains and evaluate its efficacy through an analysis of the literature. We focused on studies available in PubMed, restricting our search to English-language articles published between January 2005 and December 2024. Our review identified five studies on platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and one on hyaluronic acid (HA). The PRP studies included four clinical trials and one case report. PRP injections demonstrated short-term benefits in pain reduction and functional recovery, particularly when administered early and in multiple doses. However, long-term outcomes were often comparable to standard treatments or placebo. The study on HA indicated consistent and sustained advantages over placebo in alleviating pain, expediting the return to sport, and reducing recurrence rates. Based on the current evidence, PRP and HA may function as adjunctive therapies for acute ankle sprains, especially for short-term symptom relief and functional recovery. Treatment efficacy appears to be influenced by factors such as injection timing, volume, immobilization protocols, and the concurrent use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Nonetheless, the evidence base remains constrained by small sample sizes, heterogeneous protocols, and a lack of long-term follow-up. Therefore, further high-quality randomized controlled trials are essential to establish standardized protocols and ascertain the long-term efficacy of these regenerative therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.