ArticleBioresources and bioprocessing2025
Development of robust machine learning models to estimate hydrochar higher heating value and yield based upon biomass proximate analysis.
Article in Bioresources and bioprocessing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A robust hybrid data driven approach to model biochar yield in terms of biomass pyrolysis.Bioresources and bioprocessing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study introduces a robust machine learning framework for predicting hydrochar yield and higher heating value (HHV) using biomass proximate analysis. A curated dataset of 481 samples was assembled, featuring input variables such as fixed carbon, volatile matter, ash content, reaction time, temperature, and water content. Hydrochar yield and HHV served as the target outputs. To enhance data quality, Monte Carlo Outlier Detection (MCOD) was employed to eliminate anomalous entries. Thirteen machine learning algorithms, including convolutional neural networks (CNN), linear regression, decision trees, and advanced ensemble methods (CatBoost, LightGBM, XGBoost) were systematically compared. CatBoost demonstrated superior performance, achieving an R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.