SynthesisForensic science, medicine, and pathology2026
Forensic pathological analysis of sudden cardiac death in 10 cases with congenital coronary ostial stenosis: a technical report.
Synthesis in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) caused by congenital coronary ostial stenosis (CCOS) remains underrecognized in forensic practice due to its rarity and the diagnostic challenges. This report presents 10 autopsy-confirmed cases of CCOS-related SCD, aiming to illustrate their characteristic manifestations, pathophysiological mechanisms, and key forensic identification criteria. A systematic literature review was conducted to contextualize our findings within existing evidence. Definitive diagnosis of CCOS requires a multidisciplinary approach, integrating death scene investigation, complete autopsy (including whole-heart dissection), histopathological validation (H&E staining), and rigorous exclusion of other causes of death. Quantitative analysis showed 7 cases (70%) had right coronary artery ostial (RCO) stenosis, 1 case (10%) had left coronary artery ostial (LCO) stenosis, and 2 cases (20%) had bilateral stenosis, with 4 cases (40%) presenting obstructive fibrous membranes. This study emphasizes the necessity of a standardized anatomical protocol for coronary ostial assessment, particularly transverse sectioning at 2 mm intervals starting from the aortic sinus. These findings aim to prompt forensic pathologists to incorporate specialized coronary ostial evaluation into routine autopsy procedures, thereby reducing diagnostic omissions in sudden unexpected death investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41335268What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.