Trial reportJAMA network open2025
Biomarker-Guided Cardioprotection for Patients Treated With Anthracyclines: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04737265 (A Randomized, Open Label Pilot Trial of a Biomarker Guided Strategy of Cardioprotection in Patients With Lymphoma or Breast Cancer Treated With Anthracyclines), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Open Label Pilot Trial of a Biomarker Guided Strategy of Cardioprotection in Patients With Lymphoma or Breast Cancer Treated With Anthracyclines
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Equivalent outcomes after elective inguinal hernia repair for patients living near and far from care.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Cardio-Oncology in 2025: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Practice.Balkan medical journal · 2026Article
- Deciphering Cancer Therapy-Induced Cardiotoxicity in the Era of Spatial and Multi-Omics from Systemic Mechanisms toJournal of Cancer · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: There are gaps in the understanding of the clinical actionability of cardiovascular biomarkers for risk stratification during cardiotoxic chemotherapy. Objectives: To gain insights into an N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)-guided approach for cardioprotection in patients with breast cancer or lymphoma treated with anthracyclines and quantify the feasibility, tolerability, and exploratory efficacy of an NT-proBNP-guided strategy compared with usual care. Design, Setting, and Participants: The NT-proBNP guide, a multicenter, randomized (stratified 1:1 by cancer type) clinical trial, included 100 participants with breast cancer or lymphoma initiating anthracyclines from March 18, 2021, to October 20, 2023, who were followed up for 12 months. Interventions: Study participants in the NT-proBNP-guided arm had biomarker concentrations measured prior to anthracycline initiation (baseline), at each cycle, and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. An elevated NT-proBNP concentration triggered the initiation or titration of neurohormonal therapy. Participants in the usual care arm received routine care without prospective monitoring of NT-proBNP concentrations. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were feasibility and safety of the NT-proBNP-guided approach. Feasibility was defined by recruitment, retention, and medication compliance rates. Safety outcomes were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0, at each visit. Exploratory outcomes included differences in blinded, centrally quantified echocardiographic measures and NT-proBNP concentrations between the 2 arms. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat approach. Results: Across 100 participants (mean [SD] age, 52.2 [14.4] years; 86 women [86.0%]), 74 (74.0%) had breast cancer and 26 (26.0%) had lymphoma. At 12 months, the retention rate was 92.7% (89 of 96). In the NT-proBNP-guided arm, 27 participants had NT-proBNP elevations, with a median time from baseline to first elevation of 14 days (IQR, 0-76 days), and a median time between the first NT-proBNP elevation and neurohormonal therapy prescription of 1 day (IQR, 0.5-9 days). There were no significant differences in targeted adverse events between the NT-proBNP-guided (23 events) and usual care (16 events) arms (P = .13). At 3 months, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was modestly higher in the NT-proBNP-guided arm compared with usual care (mean difference, 2.0% [95% CI, 0.5%-3.5%]; P = .007). NT-proBNP concentrations increased in both arms over the study duration, but elevations were slightly attenuated in the NT-proBNP-guided arm. Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial of an NT-proBNP-guided approach to neurohormonal therapy in patients with cancer treated with anthracyclines demonstrates the feasibility, safety, and potential modest, early improvement in LVEF of a biomarker-guided approach. These findings provide support for further study of an NT-proBNP-guided approach to cardioprotection for patients undergoing cancer treatment. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04737265.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.