Evidence mapPaperPMID 41335439Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2025

Biomarker-Guided Cardioprotection for Patients Treated With Anthracyclines: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Congying Xia, Amanda M Smith, Bénédicte Lefebvre, Faizi A Jamal, Saro H Armenian, Daniel Koropeckyj-Cox, Liyong Zhang, Peter P Liu, Daniel Landsburg, Amy S Clark and 16 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04737265 (A Randomized, Open Label Pilot Trial of a Biomarker Guided Strategy of Cardioprotection in Patients With Lymphoma or Breast Cancer Treated With Anthracyclines), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04737265 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

A Randomized, Open Label Pilot Trial of a Biomarker Guided Strategy of Cardioprotection in Patients With Lymphoma or Breast Cancer Treated With Anthracyclines

TypeinterventionalSponsorAbramson Cancer Center at Penn MedicineRan2021 to 2025Enrolled108ConditionsCardiotoxicity, Toxicity Due to Chemotherapy, Breast Cancer, LymphomaArmsBiomarker Guided Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Congying XiaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Amanda M SmithDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Bénédicte LefebvreDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Faizi A JamalDepartment of Population Sciences, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California.
Saro H ArmenianDepartment of Population Sciences, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California.
Daniel Koropeckyj-CoxDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Liyong ZhangUniversity of Ottawa Heart Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Peter P LiuUniversity of Ottawa Heart Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Daniel LandsburgDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Amy S ClarkDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Payal D ShahDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Rebecca A HubbardDepartment of Biostatistics, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Anran HuangDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Sophia GolecDivision of Cardiology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Maureen HewittAbramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Nicholas S WilcoxDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Zhen ChenDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Leah RethyDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Wonyoung JungDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Kyunga KoDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Vivek NarayanDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Yehoda M MarteiDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Ninian N LangSchool of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom.
James L JanuzziDivision of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Baim Institute for Clinical Research, Boston.
G Michael FelkerDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Bonnie KyDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Funding

Training Program in Cardiovascular Biology and MedicineT32HL007843 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · 1996 to 2025
$3.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007843
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: There are gaps in the understanding of the clinical actionability of cardiovascular biomarkers for risk stratification during cardiotoxic chemotherapy. Objectives: To gain insights into an N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)-guided approach for cardioprotection in patients with breast cancer or lymphoma treated with anthracyclines and quantify the feasibility, tolerability, and exploratory efficacy of an NT-proBNP-guided strategy compared with usual care. Design, Setting, and Participants: The NT-proBNP guide, a multicenter, randomized (stratified 1:1 by cancer type) clinical trial, included 100 participants with breast cancer or lymphoma initiating anthracyclines from March 18, 2021, to October 20, 2023, who were followed up for 12 months. Interventions: Study participants in the NT-proBNP-guided arm had biomarker concentrations measured prior to anthracycline initiation (baseline), at each cycle, and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. An elevated NT-proBNP concentration triggered the initiation or titration of neurohormonal therapy. Participants in the usual care arm received routine care without prospective monitoring of NT-proBNP concentrations. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were feasibility and safety of the NT-proBNP-guided approach. Feasibility was defined by recruitment, retention, and medication compliance rates. Safety outcomes were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0, at each visit. Exploratory outcomes included differences in blinded, centrally quantified echocardiographic measures and NT-proBNP concentrations between the 2 arms. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat approach. Results: Across 100 participants (mean [SD] age, 52.2 [14.4] years; 86 women [86.0%]), 74 (74.0%) had breast cancer and 26 (26.0%) had lymphoma. At 12 months, the retention rate was 92.7% (89 of 96). In the NT-proBNP-guided arm, 27 participants had NT-proBNP elevations, with a median time from baseline to first elevation of 14 days (IQR, 0-76 days), and a median time between the first NT-proBNP elevation and neurohormonal therapy prescription of 1 day (IQR, 0.5-9 days). There were no significant differences in targeted adverse events between the NT-proBNP-guided (23 events) and usual care (16 events) arms (P = .13). At 3 months, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was modestly higher in the NT-proBNP-guided arm compared with usual care (mean difference, 2.0% [95% CI, 0.5%-3.5%]; P = .007). NT-proBNP concentrations increased in both arms over the study duration, but elevations were slightly attenuated in the NT-proBNP-guided arm. Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial of an NT-proBNP-guided approach to neurohormonal therapy in patients with cancer treated with anthracyclines demonstrates the feasibility, safety, and potential modest, early improvement in LVEF of a biomarker-guided approach. These findings provide support for further study of an NT-proBNP-guided approach to cardioprotection for patients undergoing cancer treatment. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04737265.

Indexed as

AnthracyclinesBreast NeoplasmsCardiotoxicityLymphomaNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide FragmentsAdultAgedBiomarkersFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAnthracyclinesBiomarkersNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide Fragmentspro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)

Identifiers

PMID41335439
PMCPMC12676363

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.