ArticlePloS one2025
Phonemic composition influences words' aesthetic appeal and memorability.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The phoenix of phonaesthetics: the rise of an old-new research paradigm on the beauty of language sound.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Positive emotional responses from pleasant experiences are known to enhance memory, yet the relationship between aesthetic appeal and linguistic memory remains understudied. To investigate this relationship, we designed pseudowords of varying appeal based on Crystal's [1] phoneme rankings. Native English-speaking participants actively memorized these pseudowords and completed a free recall test, followed by two rounds of appeal ratings. Our results showed that, contrary to our predictions, pseudowords designed to be of intermediate appeal were rated as more appealing than those designed to be highly appealing or unappealing. Nevertheless, pseudowords designed to be highly appealing were recalled most frequently - even though participants themselves did not rate them as highly appealing. Also, overall, recalled words received higher appeal ratings from participants than non-recalled ones. These findings suggest that the phonemic and phonotactic composition of words may, indeed, have aesthetic value that correlates with words' memorability. This encourages further exploration into how appeal interacts with other factors influencing linguistic cognition, including occurrence frequency or complexity. Our findings can inform applications in language learning, teaching, and marketing, while also offering theoretical contributions to our understanding of language evolution and change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.