ArticlePloS one2025
Government policy attention to aging and mental health among middle aged and older adults: A text-based analysis of chinese municipal reports.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePopulation aging has intensified mental health challenges among middle-aged and older adults. This study examines how government attention to aging issues affects mental health outcomes in this demographic.
methodsUsing data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) and municipal government work reports collected between 2011 and 2020, we constructed a government attention index. We employed fixed effects models to analyze the impact on depressive symptoms among middle-aged and older adults, exploring underlying mechanisms and population heterogeneity.
resultsHigher government attention significantly reduces depressive symptoms among middle-aged and older adults, with stronger effects observed in men and rural populations. Four key mechanisms drive these improvements: environmental enhancement, expanded social welfare, increased adult children visitation, and improved family financial status. Government attention also promotes participation in social and cultural activities but shows no significant impact on adult children's economic support or sleep duration.
conclusionGovernment attention to aging issues substantially improves mental health outcomes among middle-aged and older adults. Policymakers should strengthen responses to create more supportive social environments for this growing demographic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.