ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025
Reconstructing Waddington's landscape from data.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic Landscape Analysis of cell fate decisions provides predictive models of neural development from single-cell data.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- AbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Topological Structure of Epigenetic Forests in Flower Morphogenesis.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2026Article
- Cell cycle oscillations in a polarity network facilitate state switching by morphogenetic cues.Science advances · 2026Article
- Signals and the shape of developmental landscapes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Generative epigenetic landscapes map the topology and topography of cell fates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of a zygote into a functional organism requires that this single progenitor cell gives rise to numerous distinct cell types. Attempts to exhaustively tabulate the interactions within developmental signaling networks that coordinate these hierarchical cell fate transitions are difficult to interpret or fit to data. An alternative approach models the cellular decision-making process as a flow in an abstract landscape whose signal-dependent topography defines the possible developmental outcomes and the transitions between them. Prior applications of this formalism have built landscapes in low-dimensional spaces without explicit maps to gene expression. Here, we present a computational geometry framework for fitting dynamical landscapes directly to high-dimensional single-cell data. Our method models the time evolution of probability distributions in gene expression space, enabling landscape construction with minimal free parameters and precise characterization of dynamical features, including fixed points, unstable manifolds, and basins of attraction. We demonstrate the applicability of this framework to multicolor flow-cytometry and RNA-seq data. Applied to a stem cell system that models ventral neural tube patterning, we recover a family of morphogen-dependent landscapes whose valleys align with canonical neural progenitor types. Remarkably, simple linear interpolation between landscapes captures signaling dependence, and chaining landscapes together reveals irreversible behavior following transient morphogen exposure. Our method combines the interpretability of landscape models with a direct connection to data, providing a general framework for understanding and controlling developmental dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.