ArticleAppetite2026
Evaluating bidirectional, longitudinal associations between adolescent executive control and eating behaviors.
Article in Appetite, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adolescent eating behaviors are often characterized by poor dietary quality. Executive control (EC), also called executive function, a collection of cognitive processes under continued development in adolescence, has been proposed to influence and be affected by adolescent eating behaviors. However, conceptual and methodological limitations have hindered our understanding of the nature of these associations. The current study investigated bidirectional, longitudinal associations between adolescent EC and eating behaviors (i.e., dietary quality, fruit and vegetable intake, added sugar and saturated fat intake) across a one-year interval. As part of a longitudinal study on cognitive development and health, U.S. adolescents (N = 222, 54 % female, ages 14-18; data collected between 2017 and 2024) completed a battery of neuropsychological EC tasks and multiple 24-h dietary recalls during two timepoints in adolescence, approximately one year apart. Structural equation modeling with autoregressive controls was used. Better EC task performance at Time 1 (M age = 15.33, SD = 1.15), as modeled by a unitary latent factor, significantly predicted greater fruit and vegetable intake during the Time 2 assessment (M age = 16.2, SD = .99). No other paths between EC and eating behaviors were significant. Findings suggest adolescent EC may be an important intervention target to increase fruit and vegetable intake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.