Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41338415›Full record

ReviewIndian pacing and electrophysiology journal

Edoxaban for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation: Of randomized and real-world evidence.

Joris R de Groot

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian pacing and electrophysiology journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Joris R de GrootAmsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Heart Center, Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Heart Failure and Arrhythmias, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: j.r.degroot@amsterdamumc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common chronic arrhythmia worldwide. AF related complications include ischemic stroke, which can be prevented for largely by the use of direct oral anticoagulants. This review focuses on the randomized trial and large registries on edoxaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor. The ENGAGE-AF TIMI 48 study demonstrated that edoxaban 60/30 mg was non-inferior to warfarin for stroke or systemic embolism (SEE) prevention, while superior with regard to major bleeding. In ELDERCARE-AF, the non-approved dose of edoxaban 15 mg versus placebo resulted in a lower risk of stroke/SEE and a numerically higher major bleeding risk in elderly patients from Japan with a contraindication for anticoagulation. These results are echoed in many sub analyses, generally showing preserved efficacy and safety of edoxaban versus warfarin, in patients with varying absolute risk for clinical outcomes. Asian patients with AF, who have a different risk profile than non-Asian patients, and edoxaban proved an effective and safe anticoagulant in Asian patients too. In the ETNA-AF Global registry, comprising patients from Europe and Asia, as well as in other non-randomized real-world studies, the efficacy and safety of edoxaban was confirmed. In conclusion, edoxaban is an effective and safe direct anticoagulant for stroke prevention in AF. The large evidence base in Asian patients, in patients with cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular comorbidities and with different dosing regimens provide clinicians with a valuable option for stroke prevention in their patients with AF.

Identifiers

PMID41338415
PMCPMC12958045

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.