ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2025
Denosumab usage is associated with better overall survival of patients with lung cancer and bone metastases: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dissociated skeletal response to first-line immunotherapy in synchronous bone metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients: Clinical profiles and survival benefit of denosumab adjunction.Journal of bone oncology · 2026Article
- Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Denosumab Versus Bisphosphonates in Elderly Patients with Cancer Bone Metastases: A Target Trial Emulation Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLung cancer with progressive bone metastases usually leads to skeletal-related events (SREs) and a reduced quality of life. Denosumab delays the onset of SREs and is associated with improved overall survival. However, other factors associated with overall survival in patients with lung cancer and bone metastases remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the survival benefit of denosumab use in patients with lung cancer and bone metastases and how other factors affect overall survival in these patients.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 622 patients with lung cancer treated at a southern Taiwan Medical Center between 2018 and 2022. The overall survival of patients with lung cancer and bone metastases treated with denosumab (n=90) was compared with that of patients who did not receive denosumab (n=212). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the factors associated with the overall survival of these patients.
resultsDenosumab use was associated with improved overall survival among patients with lung cancer and bone metastases compared with untreated patients (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.80, p<0.001, overall survival 455 days vs 172 days), particularly in patients who had received more than five cycles of treatment (HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.50, p<0.001). Systemic cancer treatments, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors, chemotherapy and immunotherapy, were also associated with improved overall survival in these patients.
conclusionsDenosumab usage, especially good compliance, for over five cycles in patients with lung cancer and bone metastases was associated with improved overall survival. Future studies should focus on strategies to improve adherence to denosumab treatment and maximise its clinical benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.