Evidence mapPaperPMID 41338622Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2025

Feasibility pilot randomised controlled trial of 'Being a Parent-Enjoying Family Life': a peer-led, group intervention for parents with significant emotional and interpersonal difficulties.

Ellie Baker, Jordan Troup, Patrick Smith, Crispin Day

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ellie BakerDepartment of Psychology, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UK ellie.baker@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9665-3406
Jordan TroupDepartment of Psychology, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1115-5185
Patrick SmithDepartment of Psychology, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0743-7972
Crispin DayDepartment of Psychology, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7655-7839

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesGroup-format, peer-led parenting interventions may be valuable for parents with significant emotional and interpersonal difficulties in improving child behaviour, parenting and parent mental health. This article presents the results of a feasibility pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) of a novel peer-led group intervention, Being a Parent (BaP)-Enjoying Family Life.

designTwo-arm, parallel group superiority feasibility RCT, with pre-post intervention (postintervention) and 6-month follow-up (6-month follow-up).

settingCommunity recruitment across four South London boroughs.

participantsMain inclusion criteria were (1) primary parental caregivers, (2) aged 18-65 years and (3) significant emotional and interpersonal difficulties (score ≥3 on Standardised Assessment of Personality-Abbreviated Scale screening tool) and had a child (a) aged 2-11 years, (b) living with parent participant and (c) with caregiver-reported behavioural difficulties.

interventionsIntervention arm: BaP-Enjoying Family Life, a 10-session, peer-led, group intervention for parents with significant emotional and interpersonal difficulties. CONTROL ARM: BaP-Standard, a nine-session, peer-led group parenting intervention. OUTCOMES: Primary feasibility criteria were rates of recruitment, retention, intervention acceptability and fidelity. Initial estimates of intervention effect were measured using the Eyberg Child Behaviour Inventory (primary outcome), and the Concerns about my Child scale, Arnold O'Leary Parenting Scale, Parental Reflective Function Questionnaire, Kansas Parent Satisfaction Scale, Brief Parent Self Efficacy Scale, Brief Adjustment Scale-6 and Home Observation Measurement of the Environment (secondary outcomes). Data collection was conducted with the researcher masked to intervention allocation.

resultsPredefined thresholds were met for three of five feasibility indices and partially met for the remaining two. Eligibility criteria were met by 70% (n=77) of 110 interested parents, and 85% (n=66) of those eligible completed baseline data collection and were randomised. Data were collected at postintervention for 91% (n=60) of parents. 75% (n=49) of participants attended at least one session and 50% (n=33) completed 5 or more sessions (intervention completers). The intervention was found to be acceptable by 60.71% of participants in BaP-Enjoying Family Life and 62.50% of participants in BaP-Standard arm, increasing to 93.33% and 88.24%, respectively, among intervention completers. Fidelity was reached for three of five groups in each arm, with missing data and group cancellation contributing to lack of observed fidelity in the remaining two groups. We aimed to obtain estimates of intervention effect and, while underpowered, estimates of effect on the primary outcome (child behaviour) were moderate within each arm (BaP-Enjoying Family Life

conclusionsFindings indicate that both interventions show promise in supporting parents with significant emotional and interpersonal difficulties with limited differential effects. Further refinements which increase intervention completion, acceptability and fidelity should be conducted prior to progression to a full-scale RCT. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN10950727.

Indexed as

ParentingParentsPeer GroupPsychotherapy, GroupAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolEmotionsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsLondonMaleChild & adolescent psychiatryClinical TrialFeasibility StudiesParentsPersonality disorders

Identifiers

PMID41338622
PMCPMC12673538

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.