ReviewJACC. Heart failure2025
Management of Ischemic Heart Disease in Patients With Heart Failure: JACC: Heart Failure Position Statement.
Review in JACC. Heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ginsenoside RK3 attenuates isoproterenol-induced heart failure in mice through AMPK/Sirt1/PGC-1α pathway activation.Journal of ginseng research · 2026Article
- Pediatric heart failure in the era of cardio-immunology: inflammatory-immune context phenotypes, diagnosis, and targeted management.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Editorial: Optimizing revascularization and conservative therapy in chronic coronary syndrome.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Coronary artery disease remains a common cause of morbidity and mortality for patients with heart failure, both in the acute and chronic settings. The management decisions for these patients are complex and are often driven by the clinical setting (ie, acute vs chronic disease) and predominant symptoms (angina vs heart failure). However, there remain significant gaps in the knowledge/evidence around optimal timing and implementation of medical therapy and the role and selection of patients for revascularization. Suggested considerations for clinical practice are provided based on the current body of evidence with emphasis on ongoing gaps in knowledge for future clinical research in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.