ArticleBMJ open diabetes research & care2025
Trends in cardiovascular disease prevalence among adults with type 1 diabetes in the USA: analysis of commercial claims data, 2017-2021.
Article in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCardiovascular disease (CVD) is a common complication and major cause of mortality in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D). This study quantifies the prevalence of CVD among commercially insured adults with T1D in the USA from 2017 to 2021, overall and among age-defined and sex-defined subgroups. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsWe used Merative MarketScan nationwide commercial insurance claims database (2017-2021) to identify adults ≥20 years with T1D (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes). CVD ascertainment was based on ICD-10 codes for myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, peripheral artery disease, and stroke. Comorbidities included hypertension, obesity, hyperlipidemia, retinopathy, neuropathy, nephropathy, severe hypoglycemia, and diabetic ketoacidosis. Annual prevalence and age-specific and sex-specific prevalence of CVD were calculated overall and by comorbidities. Logistic regression was used to examine associations between sex, prevalent comorbidities, and odds of CVD.
resultsThe sample size ranged from n=21 748 in 2017 to n=13 294 in 2021. Among adults with T1D (mean (SD) age (48.51 (13.95) years in 2017 and 46.80 (13.04) years in 2021; 47% female), the prevalence of CVD ranged from 18.18% (95% CI 17.77 to 18.66%) in 2017 to 20.58% (95% CI 19.91 to 21.24%) in 2021. In 2021, among those aged 20-39 years, 40-64 years, and 65+years, the prevalence of CVD was 4.97%, 20.41%, and 52.94%, respectively. The age-adjusted prevalence of CVD was higher in males than females (21.93% vs 19.07%). Age, sex, and all comorbidities were independently associated with CVD. Odds of CVD were highest among those with hypertension (adjusted OR 3.15, 95% CI: 2.77 to 3.57).
conclusionIn this sample of US commercially insured adults with T1D, CVD prevalence remained stable at ~20% from 2017 to 2021. Early detection via improved screening and targeted management of comorbidities are key preventive strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.