ReviewAsia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition2025
Postprandial variability in plasma long-chain omega-3 is independent of supplement lipid structure.
Review in Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesPostprandial variations in plasma triacylglycerol (TAG) responses to vegetable oils are well established, but their origins remain unclear. This study examined the variability of postprandial plasma long-chain omega-3 fatty acids (LC omega-3) in response to commonly used supplements and foods and considers the biological implications of this variability. METHODS AND STUDY
designA literature review was conducted to identify postprandial studies that reported variability in plasma LC omega-3 responses to supplementation. Studies were included if variability could be expressed as the coefficient of variation (CV) for the area under the curve (AUC).
resultsTwenty-one studies encompassing 36 different treatments were identified. Supplements included LC omega-3 in the form of TAG, monoacylglycerols (MAG), free fatty acids (FFA), ethyl esters (EE), EE with emulsification agents, and whole foods. Variability was consistently observed across all forms; 65% of treatments showed a CV >50% for the AUC. Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms were reported in some studies, suggesting possible malabsorption.
conclusionsSubstantial inter-individual variability existed in postprandial LC omega-3 responses, independent of the chemical form of supplementation. This variability likely reflects differences in absorption, enterocyte metabolism, and including malabsorption. Postprandial variability may therefore contribute significantly to observed differences in tissue LC omega-3 status following LC omega-3 supplementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.