Evidence mapPaperPMID 41338955Full record

SynthesisAsia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition2025

Do dietary interventions aimed at enhancing fertility improve nutritional status in overweight or obese women?

Al Foraih Meisa, Velangi Monal

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Al Foraih MeisaFood Science and Nutrition Department, College of Health Sciences, Public Authority for Applied Education and Training, Shuwaikh Industrial, Kuwait. Email: mt.alforaih@paaet.edu.kw.
Velangi MonalDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesOverweight and obesity represent critical public health challenges, impacting over one-third of the global population. This issue is particularly pressing for women of reproductive age, who are more vulnerable to weight gain. Addressing this connection is vital for promoting overall reproduc-tive health and ensuring the well-being of future generations. This systematic review evaluates the critical relationship between preconception dietary interventions and weight loss, along with their impacts on the nutri-tional status and fertility of women with obesity. METHODS AND STUDY

designOur research draws from various literature sources, including CINAHL Plus (EBSCO), Medline, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, and the Web of Science Core Collection, covering findings from 2010 to April 30, 2024.

resultsOut of 180 studies screened, 16 met the inclusion criteria. Short-term weight loss programs showed limited impact on fertility in overweight women, and intensive weight-loss interventions were not more effective than exercise-focused programs. A preconception diet that is high in fruits, vegetables, and omega-3 fatty acids, but low in trans fats and processed foods, was associated with better fertility. The evidence regarding the benefits of weight loss is inconsistent, partly due to the reliance on indirect measures and limited use of biomarkers.

conclusionsWeight loss programs assist women with obesity in conceiving, but rapid weight loss may pose nutritional risks. Inconsistent nutritional assessments limit understanding of these programs. More objective measures are necessary to clarify the role of diet in fertility.

Indexed as

DietFertilityNutritional StatusObesityOverweightFemaleHumansWeight Lossinfertilitynutritional statusobesitypregnancywomen

Identifiers

PMID41338955
PMCPMC12664550

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.