ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning approach using electrochemical immunosensor data for precise classification of Opisthorchis viverrini infection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Opisthorchiasis, a major foodborne parasitic zoonotic disease in Thailand and neighboring countries, is caused by the carcinogenic liver fluke Opisthorchis viverrini (OV). Accurate classification of OV infection is critical for timely intervention and public health management. In this study, we propose a reliable machine learning (ML) classification model based on peak current data from an electrochemical immunosensor and additional patient condition features, which can facilitate intuitive decision-making without the need for expert personnel. This is the first report to classify OV infection using a ML algorithm integrated with electrochemical biosensor data. A total of 531 urine samples from both OV-positive and OV-negative individuals in endemic areas were analyzed using the immunosensor. We evaluated the effectiveness of six different ML models through cross-validation. Among these models, the decision tree and AdaBoost classifiers demonstrated outstanding performance, each achieving the highest accuracy of 90.65% (95% CI 0.89-0.91). The decision tree model yielded an F1 score of 91%, sensitivity of 95%, and specificity of 83%, while the AdaBoost model achieved an F1 score of 90%, sensitivity of 94%, and a higher specificity of 86%. The neural network model also performed excellently, with an accuracy of 89.72% (95% CI 0.84-0.93), and an F1 score of 89%. The statistical comparison of the model's performance highlighted the significant difference between the top-performing models and the rest. These results underscore the significance of incorporating sensor data and ML to accurately classify OV infections and enable early diagnosis and intervention. By using this ML model, the status of OV infection can be detected by interpreting sophisticated raw electrochemical data. This implies that patients or medical staff with no prior experience with electrochemical sensors can nevertheless comprehend the disease condition with confidence. The proposed ML models hold promise for enhancing disease surveillance and control strategies in endemic regions and could thus assist medical professionals in the decision-making process and in addressing the burden of opisthorchiasis infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.