ArticleScientific reports2025
Dynamic graph learning framework based seasonal and trend decomposition approach for potato crop evapotranspiration prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Efficient estimation of crop water requirements (ETc) is important for sustainable agricultural water management, particularly under increasing climate variability. Traditional methods lack a comprehensive analysis of dynamic patterns associated with crop evapotranspiration factors. To address these limitations, we propose a dynamic graph-based Dual-Graph Semantic Fusion (DG-DGSF) for ETc estimation. The multivariate time series is decomposed into trend and seasonal parts. This decomposition enables us to attain two dynamic graphs, Seasonal Dynamic Graph (SDG) and Trend Dynamic Graph (TDG), with their semantic characteristics extracted through Dual-Graph Semantic Fusion (DGSF). Each model is incorporated with the Dynamic Graph Learner (DGL) model and Graph Convolutional based on Recurrent Unit (GC-GRU) to analyse the trend and seasonal components. The DGL receives the trend or seasonal information to produce dynamic graphs, while GC-GRU combines the dynamic graph characteristics with the original series data. To effectively combine and extract the semantic characteristics from the trend and seasonal parts, a contrastive learning model is designed, followed by a supervised prediction model based on a multi-layer perceptron. The proposed DG-DGSF model was tested on data collected over two years (2023-2024) in Prince Edward Island, Canada. Three experimental locations were selected within the research farm: Location 1 consisted of loam, Location 2 featured sandy loam, and Location 3 contained loamy sand. The DG-DGSF model is compared with state-of-the-art models, including BiLSTM, GRU, GCN, BiGRU, LSTNet, DGDL, TPA-LSTM, and GCN-LSTM. The performance of the DG-DGSF is evaluated using numerous visual, statistical and probability metrics. The results demonstrated that the DG-DGSF model outperformed the benchmark models with the lowest forecasting error and highest ETc prediction rates, RMSE = 0.0469, MAPE = 0.120, NRMSE = 0.0431, KGE = 0.977, NSE = 0.963.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.