ArticleScientific reports2025
Prevalence and interrelationships of cardiometabolic risk factors in Polish adults.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and diabetes among urban adults aged 20 and older, along with examining the interrelationships among these cardiovascular health risk factors. A study was conducted involving 250 adults aged 20 and older from Rzeszów, Poland. Anthropometric measurements, blood pressure (BP) assessments, and capillary blood samples were collected following established protocols. Significant differences in BMI classifications, BP, lipid profiles, and glucose levels (collectively referred to as blood profile) were identified based on sex. Men exhibited a higher prevalence of obesity (24.0%) compared to women (19.8%). Elevated triglyceride (TG) levels were found in 38.3% of men versus 22.9% of women, while low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels were observed in 31.8% of men but only in 5.2% of women. Rates of hypertension were also higher in men than in women (38.3% versus 22.9%, respectively). Significant relationships among various risk factors, particularly the association between BMI, BP, and lipid levels in men were found. Excess weight notably increased the odds ratios for most elevated cardiovascular risk factors. This study emphasizes the necessity for targeted public health interventions, especially for men and older adults to address increased cardiometabolic risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.