ArticleThe Psychiatric quarterly2025
Psychiatric Inpatient Length of Stay and Needs: A Cluster Analysis using Machine Learning Algorithms.
Article in The Psychiatric quarterly, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding distinct inpatient profiles among individuals with mental health disorders (MHD) can inform service planning and the development of targeted interventions. This study aimed to identify patient profiles based on hospital length of stay (LOS) and associated needs, predisposing, and enabling factors. A total of 600 MHD patients hospitalized in Quebec (Canada) between 2012 and 2018 were interviewed. Using K-means cluster analysis, three distinct profiles were identified and compared based on their clinical and sociodemographic characteristics. Profile 1 (27%) included mostly younger men, with the second-longest LOS. These patients were frequently diagnosed with personality and substance use disorders (SUD), exhibited high self-reported severity of psychotic and SUD symptoms, and had histories of aggressive behavior. They were labeled as unstable psychotic patients with comorbidities living in the community. Profile 2 (37%) had the longest LOS and consisted of older, unemployed individuals with psychotic disorders or autism spectrum disorder. Many lived in supervised housing or with family and were labeled as long-term severely psychotic patients supported in the community. Profile 3 (36%) had the shortest LOS and comprised mostly women with higher education, living with a spouse. They showed high distress at admission—characterized by mood and anxiety disorders, the highest allostatic load score, suicidal ideation, and low social functioning—and were labeled as patients in suicidal crisis from distressed community environments. Findings suggest that tailored interventions—Assertive Community Treatment for Profile 1, intensive home care for Profile 2, and crisis resolution teams for Profile 3—could enhance care and potentially reduce LOS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41339593What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.