Evidence mapPaperPMID 41339732Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Examining associations among caregiver stress, social support, and the infant gut microbiota.

Sarah C Vogel, Francesca R Querdasi, Bridget L Callaghan, Natalie H Brito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah C VogelUniversity of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA. sarah.vogel@umb.edu.
Francesca R QuerdasiUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Bridget L CallaghanUniversity of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Natalie H BritoColumbia University, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

PREVENTION RESEARCH TRAINING:URBAN CHILDREN'S MENT HLTHT32MH015750 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · 1985 to 2025
$1.8M
Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine Training GrantT32GM086270 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · 2024 to 2025
$614k
Integrating eye-tracking and ECG methodologies for remote infant neurocognitive assessments in the homeR01DA059415 · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · 2025 to 2025
$568k
NICHD NIH HHS R00 HD086255NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA059415NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM086270NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH125870NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH126468NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH015750
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maternal stress is a growing societal concern, with implications for both maternal wellbeing and infant development. One of the mechanisms by which maternal stress is thought to impact infant development is by shaping the development of the infant gut microbiome. Here, we examined how measures of maternal stress and social support were associated with alpha diversity, beta diversity, and relative abundance of individual bacterial taxa in the gut microbiota at 12 months of age in a community-based sample of infants and their biological mothers (n = 34) from New York. Maternal social support was negatively associated with alpha diversity of the infant gut microbiota and was associated with abundance of bacteria from several genera. We did not find associations between caregiver perceived stress and markers of infant gut microbiota diversity or composition. Results suggest that greater social support for new parents may be associated with infant health via changes in the diversity and composition of the infant gut microbiota.

Indexed as

CaregiversGastrointestinal MicrobiomeSocial SupportStress, PsychologicalAdultFecesFemaleHumansInfantMaleMothers

Identifiers

PMID41339732
PMCPMC12783604

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.