ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Machine learning-based prediction algorithm of spontaneous preterm birth using multi-source data.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSpontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) is a complex condition with unclear etiology, associated with increased neonatal risks. Early prediction of sPTB enables timely interventions to improve outcomes. Our study aimed to construct machine learning (ML) models to predict sPTB using multi-source data, including electronic health records (EHR) and environmental factors.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 54132 singleton pregnancies from Wuhan Children's Hospital (Wuhan Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital) between December 2012 and December 2022. We collected multi-source predictors including demographics, routine prenatal tests, air pollution exposure, meteorological factors, and greenness exposure, resulting in a total of 82 predictors. Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and logistic regression (LR) models were used to construct predictive models of sPTB. Screening performance was assessed via the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) value was computed to assess the importance of each feature contributing to the prediction.
resultsThe XGBoost model yielded the best performance in the test set with an AUROC of 0.926 and an AUPRC of 0.502. Eosinophils percentage, albumin, uric acid, amniotic fluid pocket, and sulfur dioxide exposure during late pregnancy were identified as the most important predictors of sPTB.
conclusionsOur results demonstrate that combining EHR data, environmental factors, and ML methods enables highly accurate and moderately precise predictions of sPTB. While the model shows promising discriminatory power, its precision requires improvement before clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.