Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41339825›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025

Investigation of antibiotic resistance against pathogens isolated from respiratory samples in intensive care units after SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

Ayşe Çapar, Derya Özyiğitoğlu, Şeyma Başlılar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ayşe ÇaparAnaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Selimiye Mh., Tıbbiye Cd., Üsküdar/İstanbul, 34668, Turkey. drayseyel@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6485-342X
Derya ÖzyiğitoğluInfectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2776-740X
Şeyma BaşlılarChest Diseases, Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1495-6508

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has introduced major disruptions in clinical practices, including infection management strategies and antibiotic prescribing habits. This study aimed to investigate changes in the distribution of respiratory pathogens and their antimicrobial resistance (AMR) patterns in intensive care units (ICUs) before and after the onset of COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsIn this retrospective cross-sectional study, 1,662 respiratory tract samples (bronchoalveolar lavage, deep tracheal aspirate, and sputum) collected from ICU patients at a tertiary hospital in Turkey between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2024 were analyzed. The study compared bacterial isolates and resistance profiles between the pre-pandemic (January 2016-Feb 2020) and post-pandemic (Mar 2020-December 2024) periods.

resultsAcinetobacter baumannii and Klebsiella pneumoniae remained the most frequently isolated pathogens throughout the study. Post-pandemic, resistance rates increased significantly for several antibiotics, particularly against Acinetobacter baumannii (gentamicin: 70.9% to 91.3%, p < 0.001; colistin: 3.2% to 12.3%, p < 0.001) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (carbapenems: p < 0.001; colistin: 23% to 62.7%, p < 0.001). For Pseudomonas aeruginosa, meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, and ceftazidime resistance rates increased significantly after the post-pandemic period (33.9% to 52.0%, p = 0.003; 50.4% to 65.1%, p = 0.011; 27.9% to 56.4%, p < 0.001, respectively). The changes in resistance rates of Escherichia coli were not statistically significant and also showed a reduced isolation rate post-pandemic (11.4% to 7.0%, p < 0.05). Among Gram-positive isolates, only Enterococcus faecium showed a significant increase in vancomycin resistance (50.0% vs. 0%, p = 0.046). In contrast, no significant findings were observed for methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin resistance in Enterococcus faecalis (31.3% vs. 28.0%, p = 0.823; and 25% vs. 0%, p = 0.285, respectively). Mortality also increased significantly during the post-pandemic period (70.5% to 74.9%, p = 0.048), alongside a higher prevalence of comorbidities such as hypertension and coronary artery disease.

conclusionsThe findings highlight a marked escalation in AMR following the COVID-19 pandemic, likely driven by increased empirical antibiotic use, prolonged ICU stays, expanded use of invasive procedures, and broader steroid administration. This study underscores the deepening AMR crisis in ICUs and provides critical data from Turkey that may support global antimicrobial stewardship efforts.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaCOVID-19Drug Resistance, BacterialAcinetobacter baumanniiAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsKlebsiella pneumoniaeMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial resistanceCOVID-19 pandemicHealthcare-associated infectionsPrevalenceTurkey

Identifiers

PMID41339825
PMCPMC12676884

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.