ArticleBMC oral health2025
Finite element analysis of temporomandibular joint stress distribution during treatment with novel digital composite plates and invisible aligners.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSkeletal Class II malocclusion is frequently occurred in patients with orthodontics. Improper treatment may lead to double occlusion, joint pain, snapping and other symptoms. This study aims to investigate the biomechanical effects of a novel digital composite invisible appliance in treating Class II malocclusion with flexible pre-disc displacement.
methodsA 3D finite element model (FEM) of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) was constructed and simulated for three treatment stages: pre-correction, mid-correction, and post-correction. Stress distribution and gap variations were quantified at each stage using dynamic mechanical simulations. Key biomechanical parameters, including stress on the condyles, joint discs, and joint sockets, were analyzed. Statistical tests were used to assess significant differences in stress values and their spatial distribution.
resultsThe maximum stress on the articular disc in the closed-mouth state was 5.68 MPa in the pre-orthodontic phase, 4.16 MPa in the orthodontic phase, and 1.92 MPa in the post-orthodontic phase. The differences in stress across these phases were statistically significant (P < 0.001). In the open-mouth condition, the maximum stress values were 5.45 MPa during the pre-corrective and mid-corrective stages, decreasing to 3.55 MPa in the post-corrective stage. The stress differences between these stages were also statistically significant (P < 0.001). Regarding joint space measurements, before correction, the anterior, superior, and posterior gaps were 2.87 mm, 2.53 mm, and 1.53 mm, respectively. During correction, the anterior and posterior gaps measured 2.80 mm and 2.93 mm, respectively. After correction, the anterior, superior, and posterior gaps were 2.08 mm, 2.69 mm, and 2.26 mm, respectively, indicating a more uniform distribution of joint spaces.
conclusionThe novel digital composite invisible appliance significantly improves the biomechanical environment of the TMJ. It reduces stress concentrations on the joint disc, promotes uniform stress distribution, and optimizes the joint's mechanical environment, thereby lowering the risk of joint injury during treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.