Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41340021›Full record

ReviewThe journal of headache and pain2025

Is canonical SD a clinically relevant model of migraine? Argument pro.

Muhammed Miran Oncel, Andrea M Harriott

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of headache and pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Muhammed Miran OncelDepartment of Neurology, Neurovascular Research Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Rm 6.215, 149 13th Street, Charlestown, Boston, MA, 02129, USA.
Andrea M HarriottDepartment of Neurology, Neurovascular Research Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Rm 6.215, 149 13th Street, Charlestown, Boston, MA, 02129, USA. aharriott@mgb.org.

Funding

Sex Differences in the Role of Gonadal Hormones and the Hypothalamus in Migraine with Aura.K08NS124991 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Andrea M Harriott · 2022 to 2026
$1.1M
NINDS NIH HHS K08 NS124991
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Migraine with aura is a phenotypically heterogeneous disorder characterized by scintillating scotoma, sensory, language, and/or motor disturbance often followed by a severe headache, and cutaneous allodynia. Cortical spreading depression (SD), a neuro-glial slowly propagating depolarizing wave, is the likely electrical event responsible for aura and a headache trigger. While clinical and preclinical observations support these relationships, there remains controversy over the role of SD as a model of migraine. This article as part of a series of debate articles will focus on data supporting SD as a model of migraine given the relationship of SD to migraine with aura, the evidence for SD as a trigger for trigeminal pain and SD and its downstream events as targets for migraine therapeutic intervention. Taken together, the bounty of evidence suggests SD has face, construct and predictive validity for migraine and can be used as a robust and reliable model of migraine with aura.

Indexed as

Cortical Spreading DepressionMigraine DisordersMigraine with AuraAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

PMID41340021
PMCPMC12673707

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.