ArticleBMC biology2025
MCLRP: enhanced prediction of anticancer drug response through low-rank matrix completion and transcriptomic profiling.
Article in BMC biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- CCPD under sparsity and low-rank constraints: multi-frequency dynamic functional network connectivity analysis in schizophrenia.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate prediction of anticancer drug responses remains a significant challenge due to the intricate interplay between genomic features and pharmacological mechanisms. We present Matrix Completion with Low-rank Regularization and Principal Component Analysis (MCLRP), a multimodal framework that synergistically integrates low-rank matrix completion with transcriptomic principal component analysis through dual-stream feature interaction. This innovative architecture not only leverages the similarities among drugs and mutation patterns in cell lines via matrix completion but also preserves gene-level interpretability of response patterns by incorporating gene expression data into the model.
resultsBenchmarked against seven computational paradigms (including matrix completion, ridge regression, SRMF, and their hybrid variants) across the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) and Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) repositories, MCLRP demonstrated superior predictive performance for 75% of drug responses, alongside enhanced biological plausibility. Notably, the model identified imatinib as a potential therapeutic alternative for M14 melanoma cell lines through cross-drug response extrapolation, suggesting innovative strategies for overcoming doxorubicin resistance. Interestingly, our mutation-response mapping revealed that BRAF-mutated lineages exhibited a 4.7-fold increase in sensitivity (p < 1e-5) to AZ628 compared to wild-type lineages, with synergistic amplification (8.1-fold, p < 1e-7) observed in BRAF/PIK3CA co-mutants.
conclusionsThese findings establish MCLRP as a dual-purpose predictive-analytical tool that not only enhances drug response forecasting but also uncovers mutation-specific pharmacological vulnerabilities through systems-level pattern recognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.