Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41340179›Full record

ArticleEcology letters2025

Not Extremely Plastic: Testing the Limits of Morphological Plasticity in Fungal Mycelia in Response to Soil Grazers.

Carlos A Aguilar-Trigueros, Lynne Boddy, Mark D Fricker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carlos A Aguilar-TriguerosDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0512-9500
Lynne BoddySchool of Biosciences, Sir Martin Evans Building, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Mark D FrickerDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

Alexander von Humboldt-StiftungResearch Council of Finland 356191
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modular organisms such as fungi are assumed to exhibit extreme morphological plasticity, yet this assumption has rarely been tested experimentally. Their morphology emerges from local, independent responses of constituent modules, suggesting strong plastic responses to environmental conditions. While such levels of plasticity decouple morphology from ecological function, they make these organisms an ideal system for studying the evolution of plasticity. Here we quantified the plasticity of modular fungi to grazers with known strong effects on their fitness and tested two competing hypotheses: (1) fungal morphology converges on a common 'grazing-resistant' phenotype across species (i.e., extreme plasticity) or (2) grazer-induced plasticity remains limited and species-specific. We found support for the latter, suggesting a more nuanced plasticity for fungi than would be expected based on their modularity. Our study calls for refining assumptions about plasticity in modular organisms and informs the use of morphological traits as predictors of ecological function.

Indexed as

FungiMyceliumSoil MicrobiologyAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsBiological EvolutionPhenotypeSpecies Specificitycord‐formingfungal grazersfungal networksimage‐analysismodular organismsmorphological traitsphenotypic trajectoriesplasticitysoil fauna

Identifiers

PMID41340179
PMCPMC12675975

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.