Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41340632›Full record

ReviewChem & bio engineering2025

Recent Advances in Machine Learning Models for Predicting Toxicity of Inorganic Nanoparticles.

Mingli Li, Qiao-Zhi Li, Yuliang Zhao, Xingfa Gao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chem & bio engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mingli LiSchool of Advanced Interdisciplinary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Qiao-Zhi LiLaboratory of Theoretical and Computational Nanoscience, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology of China, Beijing 100190, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2301-9842
Yuliang ZhaoInstitute of Nanotechnology and Intelligence (inAI), College of Chemistry and Materials Science, Jinan University, Guangzhou 511443, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9586-9360
Xingfa GaoSchool of Advanced Interdisciplinary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1636-6336

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanoparticles (NPs) such as engineered inorganic NPs (metals, metal oxides, carbon materials, etc.) can induce cytotoxicity in normal biological systems when used for disease treatment or when exposed to the environment, which has raised widespread concerns about their safety in biomedicine, environmental chemistry, and other application fields. Therefore, developing efficient strategies for the hazard and risk assessment of NPs is extremely important to ensure their safety and sustainable development in above applications. Herein, we provide a systematic and comprehensive review that includes the following sections: (i) mechanisms and influencing factors of nanotoxicity, (ii) the classical statistical cytotoxicity prediction models such as nano-quantitative structure-activity relationship (nanoQSAR), physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK), and meta-analysis (MA) models, (iii) the ML-accelerated development of the above three types of models, and (iv) some important nanotoxicity databases. The ML-accelerated nanoQSAR, PBPK, and MA models are mainly focused, in which the ML algorithms, advantages, and schemes for model development are described, and also the prediction performance and key features that influence the cytotoxicity for the developed models are discussed in detail. In addition, future opportunities and challenges in promoting the development of highly efficient, robust, and interpretable ML models for predicting the cytotoxicity of NPs are also highlighted.

Indexed as

cytotoxicitymachine learningmechanismsnanoparticlesprediction models

Identifiers

PMID41340632
PMCPMC12670184

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.