ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Never too late to try something new: attitudes and intention to taste foods from alternative protein sources in a sample of Italian older adults.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neuroscience meets food choice: Implicit and explicit consumer responses to plant-based vs animal-based foods.Current research in food science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Nutrition in older adults requires special attention due to protein-energy malnutrition (PEM) risk. Therefore, identifying healthy and sustainable protein sources is crucial, as traditional animal proteins pose challenges to both health and the environment. While most research focuses on younger populations, this study examined the responses of older adults to three alternative protein sources (APS): one plant-based (PBF) and two animal-based sources: cultured meat (CM) and insect-based foods (IBF). We investigated the role of explicit and automatic attitudes in shaping intention to consume (ITC) and the influence of familiarity. Methods: A between-subjects design was performed: Each participant was randomly assigned to one APS, reported explicit attitudes and ITC, and completed an Implicit Association Test (IAT) to assess automatic attitudes. Results: Regression analyses showed that ITC varied across APS. For PBF, familiarity was the strongest predictor, followed by explicit attitudes related to taste and automatic attitudes. For CM, ITC was primarily associated with explicit attitudes concerning both taste and safety. For IBF, ICT was mainly related to explicit attitudes concerning taste. ANOVAs comparing the three APSs revealed that IBF was the least favored option. Unexpectedly, although PBF was rated as tastier and safer than CM, it was less preferred in terms of automatic attitudes and ITC. Discussion: These findings offer new insights into older adults' openness to APS. Disgust and perceived risk were identified as the primary factors influencing the acceptance of animal-based APS, while familiarity and automatic reactions were key factors in the acceptance of PBF. Importantly, although PBF received positive evaluations at the explicit level, it prompted negative automatic attitudes and low intention to consume, suggesting that older adults may implicitly resist PBF, viewing it as less compatible with their dietary habits compared to CM. This evidence challenges the common belief that PBF is the most accepted category of APS and highlights the need to investigate further the implicit barriers that may prevent the integration of these foods for healthy aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.