ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2025
The Psychological Journey of Patients with Atrophic Acne Scarring: A Qualitative Study Based on Uncertainty in Illness Theory.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychological Factors to Consider in Treating Patients with Acne Vulgaris.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Microneedling and Topical Retinyl Palmitate for Acne Scars: A Preliminary Split-Face Study with Placebo Control.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Atrophic acne scarring is a chronic dermatological condition with significant psychosocial impact, yet the psychological burden it imposes has been relatively underexplored in clinical practice. Objective: To explore the psychological experiences of patients with Atrophic Acne Scarring during the disease progression, and analyze their emotional changes and coping strategies based on uncertainty in illness theory. Methods: A qualitative descriptive design was employed for this study. Purposeful sampling was chosen from a tertiary hospital in Henan Province, China. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 15 patients with Atrophic Acne Scarring. The interview data was analyzed using the Colaizzi's method and results were reported following the COREQ standards. Results: A total of 4 themes and 12 sub-themes were extracted, including: 1) Confusion and Denial in the Initial Diagnosis Stage: Disease-related cognitive bias, information confusion and incorrect interventions, normalization tendency. 2) Anxiety and Shame in the Flareup Stage: Appearance monitoring behaviors, social evaluation pressure, impaired social functioning. 3) Coping Strategies in the Long-Term Adaptation Stage: Positive coping, negative coping, polarized adaptation patterns. 4) Psychological Adjustment in the Recovery Stage: Contradictory acceptance, post-traumatic growth, behavioral-psychological asynchronous improvement. Uncertainty in illness was present throughout the process, affecting patients' self-recognition, social behaviors, and treatment adherence. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that patients with atrophic acne scarring experience a four-stage psychological journey (confusion/denial, anxiety/shame, coping adaptation, and recovery adjustment), with illness uncertainty persistently impacting their psychological and social functioning. Healthcare providers should offer personalized psychological support based on the framework of uncertainty in illness theory to enhance patients' quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.