Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41341127›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025

Analysis of ultrasound parameters influencing endometrial receptivity and a pregnancy outcomes predictive model for patients undergoing

Chunlian Wang, Jiao Lin, Xingping Zhao, Ni Liu, Pengzi Sun, Jiaoli Yang, Xue Zhou

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chunlian Wang *Obstetrics and Gynecology Ultrasound Department, Xiangtan Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University, Xiangtan, Hunan, China.
Jiao Lin *Reproductive Center, Xiangtan Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University, Xiangtan, Hunan, China.
Xingping ZhaoReproductive Center, Third Xiangya Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Zhongnan University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Ni LiuObstetrics and Gynecology Ultrasound Department, Xiangtan Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University, Xiangtan, Hunan, China.
Pengzi SunObstetrics and Gynecology Ultrasound Department, Xiangtan Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University, Xiangtan, Hunan, China.
Jiaoli YangObstetrics and Gynecology Ultrasound Department, Xiangtan Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University, Xiangtan, Hunan, China.
Xue ZhouObstetrics and Gynecology Ultrasound Department, Xiangtan Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University, Xiangtan, Hunan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to assess the impact of ultrasound parameters on endometrial receptivity in patients undergoing IVF-ET and to establish a predictive model for ongoing pregnancy outcomes. Methods: The prospective cohort study included 86 patients treated at the Reproductive Center of Xiangtan Central Hospital from May to December 2024. Participants underwent multimodal ultrasound evaluation one day before embryo transfer. The study analyzed endometrial morphology, blood flow parameters, as well as three-dimensional power Doppler angiography (3D-PDA), and endometrial contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) indicators. Broussonetia papyrifera was used to establish a predictive model for sustained pregnancy. Results: Among the 86 patients, 42 (48.8%) achieved ongoing pregnancy, while 44 (51.2%) did not. Significant differences between the groups were observed in the number of mature oocytes and endometrial blood flow grading (both P = 0.005). Lasso regression identified eight predictive variables: primary cause of infertility, baseline luteinizing hormone (LH) levels, number of MII oocytes, uterine cavity volume, endometrial blood flow grading, subendometrial flow index (FI) in 3D-PDA, and endometrial and subendometrial peak intensity (PI) in CEUS. The aforementioned variables as well as embryonic factors were integrated into eight machine learning models, with the Gradient Boosting model exhibiting superior predictive performance (AUC: 0.981). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis indicated that a higher number of MII oocytes, improved endometrial blood flow, specific infertility etiologies, elevated baseline LH levels, and reduced subendometrial/endometrial PI, subendometrial FI, and uterine cavity volume were associated with a greater likelihood of pregnancy. Conclusion: The integration of 3D-PDA and CEUS technologies shifts IVF-ET evaluation from traditional morphological observation to functional assessment, offering a new perspective for predicting sustained pregnancy outcomes. This innovation shows promising clinical potential by optimizing treatment strategies like MII oocyte retrieval, improving endometrial blood flow grading, and adjusting blood flow parameters (PI and FI), significantly enhancing pregnancy success rates and advancing assisted reproductive technologies.

Indexed as

Embryo ImplantationEmbryo TransferEndometriumFertilization in VitroInfertility, FemaleAdultFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePregnancy RateProspective StudiesUltrasonographyendometrial contrast-enhanced ultrasoundIVF-ETongoing pregnancyprediction modelultrasound parameters

Identifiers

PMID41341127
PMCPMC12668944

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.