ArticleJMIR neurotechnology2024
Beyond Audio-Video Telehealth: Perspective on the Current State and Future Directions of Digital Neurological Care in the United States.
Article in JMIR neurotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic transformed neurological care by both requiring digital health modalities to reach patients and profoundly lowering barriers to digital health adoption. This combination of factors has given rise to a distinctive, emerging care model in neurology characterized by new technologies, care arrangements, and uncertainties. As the pandemic transitions to an endemic, there is a need to characterize the current and future states of this unique period in neurology. Objective: We sought to describe the current state of the pandemic- and postpandemic-related changes in neurological care and offer a view of the possible future directions of the field. Methods: We reviewed several themes across the "new digital normal" in neurology, including trends in technology adoption, barriers to technology access, newly available telehealth services, unresolved questions, and an outlook on the future of digital neurology. Results: In this new era of neurological care, we emphasize that synchronous audio-video telehealth remains the predominant form of digital interaction between neurologists and patients, mainly due to pandemic-related regulatory changes and the preexisting, steady adoption of video platforms in the prepandemic era. We also identify a persistent digital divide, with audio-only telehealth remaining a necessity for preserving care access. Asynchronous telehealth methods and services, including care coordination, interprofessional consultations, remote patient monitoring, and teletreatment are becoming increasingly important for neurological care. Finally, we identify several unanswered questions regarding the future of this "new normal," including the lasting effects of emergency regulatory changes, the value proposition of telehealth, the future of telehealth reimbursement in neurology, as well as privacy considerations and trade-offs in asynchronous neurological care models. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic has ushered in an era of digital adoption and innovation in neurological care, characterized by novel care models, services, and technologies, as well as numerous unresolved questions regarding the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.