ArticleActa gastroenterologica Latinoamericana
[Development and Internal Validation of a Predictive Model for Prognostic Response to Proton Pump Inhibitors in Adults with Functional Dyspepsia].
Article in Acta gastroenterologica Latinoamericana. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Entropy as a Tool for Quantifying Biomedical Signals: Gaps and Opportunities in Clinical Methodological Approaches-A Scoping Review.Biomedical engineering and computational biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The response to proton pump inhibitor treatment in functional dyspepsia varies among patients. A decision tool that identifies the probability of response based on clinical data could optimize management in these patients. Objective: To develop and internally validate an easy-to-use predictive model that enables clinicians to establish the probability of response to proton pump inhibitors in patients with functional dyspepsia. Material and methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study on adults with functional dyspepsia. A pilot study identified variables related to response to proton pump inhibitors. Internal validation was performed by split-sample method, with 70% for model development and 30% for validation. We developed the model using multivariable logistic regression, and selected variables based on the best subset method. The final model was subsequently transformed into a scoring rule. Predictive ability was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) and Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic. Results: A total of 192 patients were included. The best subset identified 4 variables with the best performance. The logistic model showed good calibration and discrimination with an AUC of 0.89 and a Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-square test with p = 1. The scoring rule assigned the following values: anxiety symptoms (3 points), fibromyalgia (2 points), depression (1 point), and female sex (- 1 point). A total score of 4 points or less was associated with a good response to proton pump inhibitor treatment, with a sensitivity of 96.5% and specificity of 56.6%. Conclusions: We present a novel tool that facilitates the early identification of patients with a better therapeutic response to the management of functional dyspepsia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.