Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41341925›Full record

Observational studyRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2025

Vulvar and Vaginal Graft-Versus-Host Disease: prevalence and repercussions on vaginal microbiota.

Luiza de Amorim de Carvalho Araújo, Karinne Cisne Fernandes Rebouças, Fernando Barroso Duarte, Eleutério José, Raquel Autran Coelho Peixoto

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luiza de Amorim de Carvalho AraújoUniversidade Federal do Ceará Maternidade Escola Assis Chateaubriand FortalezaCE Brazil Maternidade Escola Assis Chateaubriand, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0415-0612
Karinne Cisne Fernandes RebouçasUniversidade Federal do Ceará Maternidade Escola Assis Chateaubriand FortalezaCE Brazil Maternidade Escola Assis Chateaubriand, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6806-3804
Fernando Barroso DuarteUniversidade Federal do Ceará Departamento de Cirurgia FortalezaCE Brazil Departamento de Cirurgia, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5170-695X
Eleutério JoséUniversidade Federal do Ceará da Criança e do Adolescente Departamento de Saúde da Mulher FortalezaCE Brazil Departamento de Saúde da Mulher, da Criança e do Adolescente, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4617-7269
Raquel Autran Coelho PeixotoUniversidade Federal do Ceará da Criança e do Adolescente Departamento de Saúde da Mulher FortalezaCE Brazil Departamento de Saúde da Mulher, da Criança e do Adolescente, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2998-2779

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) carries the risk of the donor's cells recognizing the recipient as abnormal, triggering Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD). This study aimed to understand the prevalence and gynecological complications, including vaginal microbiota evaluation. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out from December 2022 to October 2023. Post-allogeneic BMT patients underwent gynecological evaluation at the Assis Chateaubriand Maternity School in Fortaleza-Ceará, Brazil, composed of structured interview and physical examination, which included collection of fresh examination of vaginal content, gram bacterioscopy and cervicovaginal cytology. Results: A total of 22 patients between 21 and 61 years old (average: 38) were evaluated, with an average of 1028 (± 979) days post BMT. Of these patients, whether or not they had Vulvar and Vaginal Graft Versus Host Disease (VVGVHD), 15 reported various gynecological complaints (dryness being the most common). Of the total, twelve showed signs of genital atrophy on examination. A 45% prevalence of VVGVHD was found, with vulvar and vaginal involvement of 100% and 60%, respectively. Burning and dyspareunia symptoms were more prevalent in patients with VVGVHD than in those without it (p<0.05); there was no difference in Human Papillomavirus (HPV) induced lesions between the two groups. However, compared to the population not undergoing allogeneic BMT, these patients had a higher prevalence of induced HPV lesions and intermediate vaginal flora. Conclusion: The findings described in the present work are consistent with other studies available in recent literature. In conclusion, VVGVHD is a potentially mutilating condition, with a significant prevalence among post-BMT patients.

Indexed as

Bone Marrow TransplantationGraft vs Host DiseaseVaginaVulvaAdultBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesDyspareuniaFemaleGenital Diseases, FemaleHumansMiddle AgedPrevalenceAtrophyBone marrow transplantationDyspareuniaGraft vs host diseaseHematopoietic stem cell transplantationVaginaVaginal diseases

Identifiers

PMID41341925
PMCPMC12671662

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.