ReviewResuscitation plus2025
Bradycardia with haemodynamic compromise in children: A scoping review.
Review in Resuscitation plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Singapore Paediatric Life Support Guidelines 2026.Singapore medical journal · 2026Guideline
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bradycardia with haemodynamic compromise is the most common in-hospital cardiac arrest initial rhythm in children. There are knowledge gaps in the efficacy of several treatments. This scoping review, part of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation continuous evidence evaluation process, sought to identify the literature on treatments for children with bradycardia and haemodynamic compromise.We searched Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane (inception-August 19, 2025) for studies involving children with bradycardia (<60 beats per minute or low for age) and haemodynamic compromise (age-based hypotension, altered mental status, or signs of shock or cardiac arrest). Data extracted included study design, population, interventions, comparators, and outcomes.We screened 5392 titles and included 27 observational studies. In twenty-six studies, children with bradycardia with haemodynamic compromise who received CPR as part of a comprehensive protocol of drugs, airway support, and chest compressions had higher survival rates when compared with children receiving the same care for a pulseless rhythm. Three studies reported conflicting associations between clinical outcomes (progression to pulselessness, return of circulation, survival) with epinephrine use during CPR. Two studies reported atropine use in patients with haemodynamic compromise, one with CPR and one without. No studies assessed oxygen administration, assisted ventilation, or transcutaneous pacing. Conclusions: There is insufficient evidence to move to a systematic review for any treatment strategy for paediatric bradycardia with haemodynamic compromise. Current guidelines are based on limited evidence and expert opinion. Comparative trials evaluating possible treatments for children with bradycardia with haemodynamic compromise are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.