Observational studyWomen's health (London, England)
Exploring the role of menstrual perceptions on health, well-being, and daily functioning.
Observational study in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMenstrual cycles are a natural part of many people's health, yet are subject to stigma and misinformation, which can affect the experience of menstrual-related symptoms and overall well-being.
objectivesThe study explored how perceptions of the menstrual cycle are associated with symptom severity and their impact on daily life, including work, social activities, and intimate relationships.
designA cross-sectional observational study.
methodsAn anonymised online survey, distributed through social media, email, and newsletters. Participants aged 18 and older who menstruated in the previous 12 months were included. Demographic data, menstrual cycle characteristics, and self-reported symptom severity were collected. Perceptions of menstruation were measured using a 5-point Likert scale. Nonparametric statistical tests, including Kruskal-Wallis, chi-square, and Spearman's rank-order correlation, were used for data analysis.
resultsIn total, 4735 responses were included in the analysis. Positive perceptions of menstruation were associated with lower reported pain levels and reduced disruption to daily activities, including work and academic performance. Notably, 90.71% reported that menstrual symptoms disrupted their work, with 31.8% taking time off in the past 12 months. Intimate relationships were affected for 84.31% of participants, with significant correlations between comfort in seeking support from partners and the disruption of intimacy (
conclusionsThe findings suggest an association between menstrual perceptions in shaping the experience of symptoms and their broader psychosocial impacts. Enhancing menstrual health literacy and promoting positive perceptions could improve individual health outcomes and societal attitudes. Future public health policies should integrate menstrual health education and supportive workplace policies to enhance the quality of life for those who menstruate. REGISTRATION: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.