Trial reportTranslational vision science & technology2025
Automated Retinal Vascular Analysis Reveals Response to Acetazolamide in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.
Trial report in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To assess whether automated analysis of retinal arterioles and venules can identify treatment response in papilledema secondary to idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). Methods: This retrospective analysis used data from a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled IIH treatment trial. Participants (n = 165) with mild visual loss were assigned to a dietary/lifestyle modification plus acetazolamide (ACZ) or placebo for 6 months. Color fundus photographs, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and clinical metrics were collected at baseline and at multiple follow-up visits. AutoMorph, a deep learning-based pipeline, quantified venule and arteriole diameters, fractal dimensionality, tortuosity, and vessel density. Venular widths were standardized to arteriolar widths to form a venule-to-arteriole (V:A) ratio, which was correlated with Frisén grade, OCT optic nerve head (ONH) parameters, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) opening pressure. Results: Baseline vascular OCT metrics and Frisén grades were similar between groups. At month 1, ACZ significantly reduced venule diameters (-4.59 µm; P = 0.02), and placebo showed no change (+1.21 µm; P = 0.54). The V:A ratio was consistently lower in the ACZ group than placebo from month 1 (1.20 vs. 1.24, respectively; P = 0.03) to month 6 (1.16 vs. 1.23, P = 0.02). Higher Frisén grades correlated strongly with increased mean V:A values (R2 = 0.91, P = 0.011). The V:A ratio was significantly associated with CSF opening pressure at month 6 (R2 = 0.47, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Automated retinal vessel analysis provides a promising, non-invasive method for monitoring treatment response in IIH and may complement traditional imaging and clinical assessments. Translational Relevance: Deep learning-based retinal vessel metrics may provide an accessible biomarker for monitoring treatment response in papilledema.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.