ReviewMolecular neurobiology2025
Extracellular Vesicles: a Promising Therapy for Treatment of Central Nervous System Ischemia Reperfusion Injury.
Review in Molecular neurobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Central nervous system ischemia-reperfusion injury, including cerebral ischemia reperfusion injury (CIRI) and spinal cord ischemia reperfusion injury (SCIRI), poses significant challenges in neurology. This condition is characterized by severe tissue damage following the restoration of blood flow after an ischemic event. Current therapeutic strategies primarily focus on re-establishing perfusion but often fail to address the secondary injuries induced by reperfusion, underscoring the need for innovative treatment. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) facilitate intercellular communication by transferring proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids, thereby influencing cellular pathways. This review examines the potential of EVs as a promising therapeutic strategy for central nervous system I/R injury. Growing evidence suggests that EVs can mitigate pathological mechanisms in both CIRI and SCIRI. Preclinical studies demonstrate that EVs derived from stem cells, astrocytes, and immune cells have shown potential in reducing damage and promoting recovery. Despite encouraging preclinical outcomes, the clinical translation of EV-based therapies faces several challenges, including standardization of EV production, optimization of delivery methods, and comprehensive evaluation of their safety and efficacy. Future research should prioritize elucidating the molecular mechanisms of EV action, refining production and delivery systems, and conducting clinical trials to assess the long-term therapeutic effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41342990What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.