ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2025
Non-Invasive Remote Monitoring in Heart Failure: Towards Wearable Devices and Artificial Intelligence Solutions : Short Title: Remote Monitoring and Wearable Devices in Heart Failure.
Review in Current heart failure reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Remote monitoring and outcomes in heart failure: 5-year study.Journal of cardiovascular medicine (Hagerstown, Md.) · 2026Article
- Quality of Evidence in Remote Monitoring of Patients With Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review.Gastro hep advances · 2026Review
- Digital health technologies for the management of sarcopenia in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis: a narrative review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Integrating digital health and remote monitoring: emerging trends in cardiac rehabilitation research for chronic heart failure.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review examines the potential benefits of non-invasive remote monitoring in patients with heart failure (HF), focusing on early detection of clinical deterioration and reducing hospitalizations. Key questions addressed include: Can remote monitoring prevent hospitalisations in patients with HF? Does it improve quality of life and promote self-care? Is it cost-effective? Can artificial intelligence (AI) facilitate its implementation? RECENT
findingsMonitoring with non-wearable and wearable devices reduces hospitalizations by detecting early signs of deterioration and enhancing self-care behaviour. While the initial investment can be high, the long-term cost-effectiveness is supported by reduced hospitalisations. AI is increasingly integrated into monitoring systems, enhancing predictive accuracy and personalized care. Remote monitoring reduces mortality and hospitalisations in patients with HF, with benefits in cost-effectiveness, and the potential to optimize care delivery by integrating AI. Future research should focus on identifying monitoring strategies for specific HF populations, such as patients with advanced HF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.