ReviewOphthalmology and therapy2026
Current Landscape and Future Prospects of Corneal Regenerative Medicine.
Review in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epithelial and Topographic Corneal Remodeling After Ptosis and Ectropion Surgery: An MS-39-Based Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- TGIF1-mediated corneal fibrosis inhibition: a gene-editing alternative to keratoplasty?Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Prosthetic Corneal Surgery: A Narrative Review of Current Keratoprostheses and the Future Prospects of New Biomaterials.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Corneal disorders are among the leading causes of visual impairment worldwide, with corneal transplantation historically serving as the cornerstone of surgical treatment. However, the global shortage of donor tissue, risk of immune rejection, and variable long-term graft survival underscore the urgent need for alternative approaches, particularly in the setting of ocular surface diseases such as inflammation or dry eye that can compromise graft survival. Regenerative medicine has emerged as a transformative paradigm, offering strategies to restore corneal architecture and function through cell-based therapies, tissue engineering, and gene modulation. These strategies are promising, addressing structural repair and modulating wound-healing responses. In the corneal epithelium, cultivated limbal epithelial transplantation, simple limbal epithelial transplantation, and cultivated oral mucosal epithelial transplantation have expanded therapeutic options for limbal stem cell deficiency, with clinical trials demonstrating long-term ocular surface stability. Regulatory approval of commercial products, such as Holoclar and Nepic, confirms the potential of standardized regenerative products. Stromal regeneration with stromal and mesenchymal stem cells has shown promise in preclinical and early phase clinical trials, with intrastromal stem cell injection improving corneal transparency and biomechanics and potentially stabilizing progressive disorders such as keratoconus. For endothelial dysfunction, intracameral injection of cultured corneal endothelial cells supplemented with Rho-associated protein kinase (ROCK) inhibitors has yielded sustained corneal clarity and visual restoration at 5-10 years, marking a paradigm shift from transplantation to minimally invasive, donor-independent therapies. Tissue engineering innovations, including matrices, hydrogels, and three-dimensional bioprinting, are advancing toward translation, while gene therapy approaches using viral vectors and Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats -Cas9 are being explored to modulate angiogenesis, fibrosis, and inherited dystrophies. Overall, regenerative medicine is reshaping corneal therapeutics, offering effective alternatives to conventional transplantation with reduced donor dependence and improved safety. Future work must focus on long-term safety, cost-effectiveness, and equitable global access to realize its full clinical potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.