Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41343660›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Random time-shift approximation enables hierarchical Bayesian inference of mechanistic within-host viral dynamics models on large datasets.

Dylan J Morris, Lauren Kennedy, Andrew J Black

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dylan J MorrisSchool of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7890-1501
Lauren KennedySchool of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Andrew J BlackSchool of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3299-4866

Funding

Software development for Stan to improve survey statistics for non-probability samplesR01AG067149 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI GELMAN, ANDREW · 2020 to 2022
$967k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG067149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanistic mathematical models of within-host viral dynamics are tools for understanding how a virus' biology and its interaction with the immune system shape the infectivity of a host. The biology of the process is encoded by the structure and parameters of the model that can be inferred statistically by fitting to viral load data. The main drawback of mechanistic models is that this inference is computationally expensive because the model must be repeatedly solved. This limits the size of the datasets that can be considered or the complexity of the models fitted. In this paper we develop a much cheaper inference method for this class of models by implementing a novel approximation of the model dynamics that uses a combination of random and deterministic processes. This approximation also properly accounts for process noise early in the infection when cell and virion numbers are small, which is important for the viral dynamics but often overlooked. Our method runs on a consumer laptop and is fast enough to facilitate a full hierarchical Bayesian treatment of the problem with sharing of information to allow for individual level parameter differences. We apply our method to simulated datasets and a reanalysis of COVID-19 monitoring data in an National Basketball Association cohort of 163 individuals.

Indexed as

Host-Pathogen InteractionsModels, BiologicalAlgorithmsBayes TheoremComputational BiologyComputer SimulationCOVID-19HumansSARS-CoV-2Viral Load

Identifiers

PMID41343660
PMCPMC12688156

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.