ArticleBMJ open2025
Understanding recovery experiences and occupational support needs among substance use peer workers: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe USA is facing a substance use workforce crisis, due in part to a shortage of providers. Substance use peer workers (PWs) fill a critical gap in the care continuum and are a growing sector of the workforce. In their daily work of providing non-clinical services to highly vulnerable people who use drugs, PWs are repeatedly exposed to stress, trauma and loss, which can adversely affect their well-being and recovery. This review aims to synthesise available evidence on PWs' experiences working in the field, its impact on their recovery and their occupational support needs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a qualitative systematic review using the PRISMA flow diagram to illustrate article identification and screening. We will search six databases (Academic Search Complete, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL, MEDLINE, SocINDEX, PubMed) for English-language peer-reviewed scientific literature published between January 1, 2000, and August 13, 2025. Eligible articles must primarily focus on PWs' perspectives and experiences related to working in the field and the impact of this work on their recovery. Article screening and data extraction will be conducted independently by two trained research assistants and supervised by a third researcher who will resolve any disagreements. We will use a thematic synthesis approach to synthesise findings of included articles and report synthesised findings in accordance with Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Findings guidelines. We will assess article quality using the CASP Qualitative Checklist and assess our confidence in individual review findings using the GRADE-CERQual approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required, as the research only involves published work. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations and online via social media. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD420251105491.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.