ArticleNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2026
Switching from anti-CD20 therapies to cladribine and vice versa - Analysis of a German relapsing multiple sclerosis cohort.
Article in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- International Expert Opinion on Optimal Switching to Cladribine Tablets from Other High-Efficacy Disease-Modifying Therapies for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: Opportunities and Challenges.Neurology and therapy · 2026Review
- Treatment-free remission in MS: long-term disease control with cladribine tablets.Journal of neurology · 2026Review
- Switching high efficacy therapies in Multiple Sclerosis: Does real world experience support such a strategy?Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anti-CD20 antibodies and cladribine are established therapies for active relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). Increasing evidence suggests that switching between these therapies may be beneficial in patients with ongoing disease activity under current treatment. In this multicenter retrospective study across six German MS centres, a total of 90 patients with active RMS were considered for inclusion, of whom 71 patients were switched either from anti-CD20 antibodies to cladribine (n = 31) or from cladribine to anti-CD20 antibodies (n = 40), with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. At treatment initiation, patients switching from anti-CD20 antibodies were older, had a longer disease duration, and a higher disability score compared to those switching from cladribine (p = 0.0040, p = 0.0447, p = 0.0028, respectively). The primary reason for switching was disease activity. Following the switch, the proportion of patients with relapsing disease activity was markedly reduced (from 55 % to 16 % for anti-CD20 to cladribine, and from 83 % to 25 % for cladribine to anti-CD20). Clinical outcomes improved, while serum biomarkers such as neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein remained stable over six months. Notably, the prevalence of hypogammaglobulinemia decreased after switching from anti-CD20 therapies to cladribine. These results indicate that patients with active RMS can achieve clinical stabilization after switching therapies in either direction, underscoring the complementary mechanisms of action and the safety of such an approach in real-world practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.