ArticleScientific reports2025
Revealing neural resonance in neuronal ensembles through frequency response tests.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Photobiomodulation emerges as a novel method to boost neuronal activities and brain function, with notable implications for treating brain disorders. Yet, the mechanisms and optimal frequency parameters of transcranial photobiomodulation are still unclear, which highlights a research gap in understanding how different stimulation frequencies affect neural responses. This study proposes a hypothesis that the nervous system exhibits resonance phenomena, suggesting that external stimuli near the system's resonant frequency trigger the strongest responses. We tested this by performing frequency response tests with pulsed transcranial near-infrared light (10-200 Hz) on mouse brains, monitoring neural responses across frequencies by analyzing cerebral blood flow, concentration of oxygenated hemoglobin, and neurophysiological activity in both cortical and deep brain regions. Our results reveal pronounced neural responses in cortical and deep brain areas at 60-80 Hz and 120-140 Hz, suggesting the potential existence of neural system resonance. Conceptually, the neural system appears to be modulatable by external stimuli, reaching maximal neural response when the stimulation frequency aligns with the system's resonant frequency, leading to neural resonance. These findings will expect to become guide new theoretical frameworks and strategies for neural modulation and therapeutic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.