ArticleScientific reports2025
Spatial and environmental drivers of Varroa destructor detection in New South Wales, Australia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Varroa destructor is a major global threat to apiculture. Its recent detection in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, triggered an eradicative response followed by a transition to ongoing management. To identify factors influencing the probability of Varroa presence across apiaries in NSW, we developed a Bayesian hierarchical logistic regression model, incorporating surveillance data alongside climatic and environmental covariates. Our analysis revealed that detection probability was higher in the eradication emergency zone compared to the general emergency zone and more likely during the summer than winter. Maximum summer temperature was positively associated with Varroa presence, while minimum winter humidity was negatively associated with Varroa presence. Surveillance methods also influenced detection probabilities, with sticky traps showing higher probabilities than sugar shake methods. Public reports were associated with higher detection probabilities compared to inspections by authorised officers. The probability of detection was lower in areas with registered beekeepers within a 50-km radius compared to areas without registered beekeepers. We observed residual spatial cluster in Varroa distribution across the Sydney Basin and extending into the Central Tablelands, suggesting the influence of unmeasured risk factors. These findings highlight the need for targeted surveillance during high-risk seasons and in identified hotspot regions, supported by the wider use of sensitive detection methods and stronger community engagement, to improve early detection and sustainable management of Varroa in Australia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.