Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41345240›Full record

Articlenpj antimicrobials and resistance2025

Host genetics regulate bacterial plasmid conjugation differentially in avian ceca explant co-culture through secretory miRNA.

Caleb Skow, Logan C Ott, Susan J Lamont, Melha Mellata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in npj antimicrobials and resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Caleb Skow *Interdepartmental Graduate Microbiology Program, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
Logan C Ott *Interdepartmental Graduate Microbiology Program, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
Susan J LamontDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
Melha MellataInterdepartmental Graduate Microbiology Program, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA. mmellata@iastate.edu.

Funding

the U.S. Department of Agriculture's National Institute of Food and Agriculture 20236701539078USDA Animal Health project IOW05620USDA Hatch projects IOW05700 and IOW04202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid emergence of multidrug-resistant virulent bacteria poses a global health concern. It is enabled through the lateral transfer of plasmid-carrying antibiotic resistance and virulence genes between bacteria. The guts of animals, particularly chickens, are recognized as reservoirs for this plasmid transfer, yet the regulation of this process by host factors remains poorly understood. Here, we examined the role of chicken intestinal tissue in the lateral transfer of the antimicrobial resistance plasmid pAPEC-O2-211A-ColV from its natural bacterial host, E. coli APEC-O2-211, to the plasmid-free E. coli HS-4 using an explant model, and how chicken host miRNAs contribute to this process. Ceca tissues collected from commercial and heritage birds were exposed to bacterial conjugation mixtures. Host small RNAs were extracted from chicken ceca tissue and evaluated for their effect on conjugation in vitro. We observed the expected bactericidal effect of chicken host tissues on both donor and recipient populations, alongside a variable response of bacterial conjugation influenced by different host genetic backgrounds. Additionally, we observed a correlation between small RNAs, mimic RNAs and bacterial plasmid conjugation in vitro. This study shed light on the role of small RNAs derived from host tissue in the differential regulation of bacterial plasmid conjugation.

Identifiers

PMID41345240
PMCPMC12678430

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.