ArticleHigh blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension2026
External Validation and Local Adaptation of Estimated Pulse Wave Velocity Models in a Brazilian Population.
Article in High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionEstimated pulse wave velocity (ePWV) is a non-invasive and low-cost method that uses age and blood pressure to assess cardiovascular risk. However, as it is not a true measure of arterial mechanics, its accuracy in diverse cohorts, such as Brazilian populations, is uncertain due to inherent genetic and environmental differences.
aimto externally validate existing European ePWV equations and develop new, population-specific models for ePWV estimation in a large, admixed Brazilian cohort.
methodsWe analyzed data from 2122 Brazilian adults, assessing carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), age, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and sex. Linear regression models were developed, incorporating all these variables as predictors. Model performance was evaluated using root mean square error (RMSE) and coefficient of determination (R
resultsThe newly developed equations demonstrated superior performance compared to existing European models. Our best-performing model (Equation 2) achieved an RMSE of 0.744 in individuals without cardiovascular risk factor, demonstrating superior performance to the model derived by the Arterial Stiffness Collaboration Group (ASCG) (RMSE: 0.879). Inclusion of sex as a predictor further improved model accuracy. Bland-Altman analyses revealed narrower limits of agreement for the new models. Notably, higher prediction errors were observed in subgroups underrepresented in the sample, such as individuals with very high cfPWV, advanced age, or elevated MAP.
conclusionsPopulation-specific ePWV equations tailored to the Brazilian cohort provide more accurate estimations of arterial stiffness. This improved precision is clinically meaningful, allowing for better stratification of cardiovascular risk using a low-cost tool readily applicable in the public health system. These findings underscore the importance of developing and validating cardiovascular risk assessment tools within diverse populations to enhance predictive accuracy and clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41345377What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.